This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of utilise.

(Image: Puget Systems)
Puget Systems is a custom PC builder from — where else? — the Puget Audio area, and in a new blog post information technology's sharing some very interesting information nearly hardware failure rates over the past 2 years, both from its own labs and from systems in its customers' hands. Like whatsoever boutique store, Puget puts each organisation it assembles through a battery of tests earlier shipping it to the customer and so information technology tin can make sure the hardware in question is working properly, which sometimes leads to failure. Likewise, a particular component volition occasionally fail once it's "in the field" so to speak, and Puget has collected all this data to summarize what it has constitute to exist the virtually, and least, reliable hardware from the vendors information technology uses for its workstation systems. Afterward combing through all the information, Puget has also awarded a single component as the nearly reliable product a PC builder tin can buy, and the winner will not come equally a surprise to any savvy PC builder.

Intel and AMD CPUs

Since this is by and large workstation data, the bulk of the CPUs tested come from those product segments, merely it nevertheless includes enthusiast fries from AMD and Intel. Puget notes that, "AMD CPUs in general had higher failure rates than Intel, just we did encounter an oddly high rate of failures with Intel's consumer-oriented 11th Gen processors… which seems odd, peculiarly next to the very low rates shown by the preceding tenth Gen."

Intel's 10th-gen chips were remarkably reliable, with the AMD Ryzen 5000 series hitting a ii per centum failure charge per unit in the lab, with only 0.77 percent in the field. The winner is evidently Intel'south Xeon Due west-2200 series, which had zero failures both in-field and in the lab.

Without the impact of 11th Gen, Intel would be more than reliable than AMD overall according to this graph. 11th Gen's failure rate is high enough to push Intel into that position.

GPUs

Puget simply uses Nvidia cards, both enthusiast and workstation models, then there'due south no news on AMD GPUs here. The just notable takeaway from its information, which is a bit surprising, is that Nvidia'due south own Founder'due south Edition cards are more reliable than those built by its partners. The delta isn't massive, listen you, but it looks similar Nvidia did some impressive engineering science on the FE models, which naturally were the hardest to find for sale anywhere. Something too went seriously wrong with its RTX Quadro cards, which eventually had their proper name changed to Professional RTX A Series.

SSD and HDD

This is easily the near interesting nautical chart then far every bit it provides very useful data, in our stance at least. The most hit outcome is the 0.0 percent failure rate for the Samsung 870 EVO/QVO SSDs, which is quite astonishing, as information technology's over a two year period. Not a unmarried failure? Kudos to Samsung. Its 860 Pro and 980 Pro models were also practically failure-free also, so a very stiff showing here from Samsung. It's also notable, equally Puget points out in its write-upwardly, that both Western Digital HDD models it uses have near identical failure rates, despite existence targeted at different audiences (NAS vs. Enterprise). And finally, while the Seagate Firecuda SSD did have a 0.65 percent failure rate in the lab, not a single one of them has ever died in a customer's hands, which is adept news. This chart also definitely indicates SSDs are more reliable than HDDs, at to the lowest degree among the products that were compared.

We take mixed data on this signal overall. According to information released past Backblaze, HDD and SSD failure rates are similar. This stardom could be caused by several factors, including the different workload demands on end-user hardware, differences in testing criteria, and the length of fourth dimension hardware was evaluated.

Power Supplies

Puget only uses two brands of PSUs, Super Flower and EVGA, simply its data shows a articulate correlation betwixt higher wattage and college failure rates. As Puget puts it, "which makes sense, given that they are likely to be handling a lot larger and maybe more sustained power loads." Overall though, none of the failure rates shown past any PSUs were troubling, leading to the determination that both brands are reliable overall. It also states that all of the PSUs higher up are modular, in case that is of involvement to anyone.

The Near Reliable – Samsung SSDs

According to Puget systems, out of all the parts it has tested over the years, Samsung SSDs have shown themselves to be the near reliable component, bar none. The visitor notes in its blog post that information technology has sold over 35,000 Samsung SSDs over the years, and recorded only 100 failures total. Most if not all PC builders are enlightened of Samsung's stellar reputation in the SSD world, not merely for its drives' performance but too for their reliability and excellent software. Even so, it is yet interesting to see that reputation backed upwards by some real-world data that includes thousands of drives existence used in the real world.

The full report is right hither, and includes some categories we skipped over due to editorial discretion. We highly recommend you lot check it out.

At present Read:

  • HP Unveils 'Cryo Chamber' CPU Cooling System
  • CES: Samsung Announces Globe'due south First 240Hz 4K Gaming Monitor
  • CES: AMD Details Five-Cache, Zen 4, and the Ryzen 6000 Mobile Family